On the revision of preferences and rational inference processes
نویسنده
چکیده
Orderings and inference relations can be successfully used to model the behavior of a rational agent. This behavior is indeed represented either by a set of ordered pairs that reflect the agent’s preferences, or by a rational inference relation that describes the agent’s internal logics. In the finite case where we work, both structures admit a simple representation by means of logical chains. The problem of revising such inference processes arises when it appears necessary to modify the original model in order to take into account new facts about the agent’s behavior. How is it then possible to perform the desired modification ? We study here the possibilities offered by the technique of ’chain revision’ which appears to be the easiest way to treat this kind of problem: the revision is performed through a simple modification of the logical chain attached to the agent’s behavior, and the revision problem boils down to adding, retracting or modifying some of the links of the original chain. This perspective permits an effective treatment of the problems of both simple and multiple revision. The technique developed can also be used in some limiting cases, when the agent’s inference process is only partially known, encoded by an incomplete set of preferences or a conditional knowledge base.
منابع مشابه
The Tyler Rationale and plagiarism: A comparative Analysis of Rational book and it's revision
»Basic principles of curriculum and instruction« book by Ralph Tyler is the most challengeable work in the field of curriculum that has been criticized with various groups. Some of them believe it is a plagiarism and others view it’s questions as a basic for curriculum engineering. Exploring divers ideas toward the Rational and reappraise by comparing it and it's revision are two main purposes ...
متن کاملRational Choice, Deliberative Democracy, And Preference Transformation
Within democratic theory, rational choice theories have for some time been challenged by approaches of ‘deliberative democracy’. I argue that the central analytical contrast between these theories consists in their differing focus on preferences: while rational choice takes them to be stable for the time frame in question and exogenous to the decision process to be analysed, deliberative theory...
متن کاملروش های تربیت عقلانی بر مبنای اندیشه امام خمینی(ره)
This paper reviews training methods based on rational thoughts of Imam Khomeini, "RAh" is. It can be intellectual as the main point of theoretical challenges, the comments cited in the field. Such is the wisdom with multiple meanings and its different divisions, subject always dialogue was thinkers East and West. Research methods - descriptive and analytical. Hence the author has tried to ana...
متن کاملRational Belief Revision ∗ ( Preliminary Report )
Theories of rational belief revision recently proposed by Alchourrón, Gärdenfors, Makinson, and Nebel illuminate many important issues but impose unnecessarily strong standards for correct revisions and make strong assumptions about what information is available to guide revisions. We reconstruct these theories according to an economic standard of rationality in which preferences are used to se...
متن کاملRational Belief Revision
Theories of rational belief revision recently proposed by Gärdenfors and Nebel illuminate many important issues but impose unnecessarily strong standards for correct revisions and make strong assumptions about what information is available to guide revisions. We reconstruct these theories according to an economic standard of rationality in which preferences are used to select among alternative ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Artif. Intell.
دوره 152 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2004